SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes



 Home > Opinion > Story

Published - Tuesday, August 26, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (2 comment(s))

EDITORIAL: Critic of gays in military undermines own cause

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
When the history of gays in the military is written, Elaine Donnelly may go down as a person who did more than any other to shatter the barrier that keeps homosexuals from serving openly in the U.S. armed forces.

Not that Donnelly favors allowing gays in the military — she believes just the opposite. However, her testimony before a Congressional committee in July did more to discredit the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy than any critic could have hoped.

The nation has changed considerably since 1993, when “don’t ask, don’t tell” — the policy that allows gays and lesbians to serve as long they manage to keep their sexual orientation a secret — was forged in the early years of the Clinton Administration. Back then, when only 44 percent of Americans believed gays should be allowed to serve, military leaders could plausibly argue that the presence of gays would undermine morale and cohesion in a fighting force that disapproved of homosexuality. Today, 75 percent of Americans believe gays should be allowed to serve openly. Attitudes toward gays and lesbians have transformed just as quickly as racial attitudes transformed during the 1950s and 1960s.

Yet there was Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, testifying before the House Armed Services Committee and painting a lurid picture of gays as sexual predators and indiscriminate speaders of HIV. In her opening statement, she listed examples of sexual misconduct by gay and lesbian soldiers, one of which dated back to 1974. She somehow managed to drag disgraced Idaho Sen. Larry Craig’s incident in a Minneapolis airport rest room into her testimony.

By that logic, examples of misconduct by heterosexuals make all heterosexuals unfit for military service. Or perhaps examples of misconduct by Wisconsin residents — there’s the sheriff’s deputy who killed six people in Crandon — means nobody from Wisconsin can ever be recruited.

Donnelly also argued it’s impossible to admit gays without an extreme version of gay affirmative action. That’s absurd. The military already admits racial and religious minorities and holds everyone, regardless of race, religion or ethnicity, to the same high standards of conduct. Gays and lesbians aren’t asking for special treatment; they are asking to be judged by the same standards as their heterosexual peers.

If Donnelly’s dark view of gays and lesbians is correct, not only should gays be excluded from the military, they should be excluded as teachers, custodians, assembly-line workers or from any workplace where people interact with each other. Most Americans disagree. They have moved past Donnelly’s ugly and cruel stereotypes and accepted gays and lesbians as legitimate human beings deserving of full participation in American society. That participation should include service in the United States military.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Donnelly wrote on Aug 22, 2008 12:56 PM:

" If Donnelly made those comments with those intentions in mind she is an idiot. As far as gays in the military go you my opinion as a former Air Force Sergeant is it would be discriminatory to not allow or not give equal treament to gays in the service. IN the services the percentage is very high (especially men to men) that gays are generally not wanted to members who would accept it, but would prefer gays find a different path.
You can change attitudes over time, though gays in todays military flat out are not welcomed with open arms. This being said it is up to the gay person to choose if they want to join an occupation where by law they are able to join and must have a fair chance at promtion and opportunities, but most likely won't accept you. "

If everyone wrote on Aug 22, 2008 9:55 AM:

" would just keep their sexual conduct a private thing, there might be no problem, but we all know that not everyone will. No one should have to put up with advances in the shower, or homosexual activity going on in the next bunk. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Coulee News.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The Coulee News, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The Coulee News requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Coulee News. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.