.
Ron Paul is not with the majority of Republicans with Iraq/foreign policy, but on every other issue Ron Paul is right on with the base. McCain is not with the Republican base on taxes, global warming, free speech, drilling for more oil, POW/MIA issue, immigration, torture, etc., but then you have Iraq where he is in line with the majority party of his party.
Joe Lieberman (with Iraq) is line with the Republican party to. Would Republicans vote for a Joe Lieberman just because of Iraq? I suppose there will be a few hardcore neo-cons (big government Republicans) like Bill Kristol and Fred Barnes out there who would, but the majority would not.
A vote for McCain is basically like voting for Lieberman. The biggest thing these McCain and Lieberman have in common is they both have alienated their party’s base. I hope a lot of conservatives will weigh all the issues and see that in total, Paul’s views line up to be more conservative than McCain’s “conservative/nation building” view on Iraq.
When did being conservative only become about staying in Iraq for 100 years and supporting nation building around the world? Whatever ever happened to small government, low/zero taxes, personal freedom and liberty of the individual over state power?
.
Iconoclast421 wrote on Feb 20, 2008 7:09 PM: