SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes



 Home > Opinion > Story

Published - Thursday, February 14, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (2 comment(s))

OTHER VIEWS: Wisconsin deserves a presidential debate

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
When a political candidate starts demanding more debates, it’s usually because his or her campaign needs a lift.

In recent days, Hillary Clinton and some of her key Wisconsin supporters have tried to pressure Barack Obama into debating at Marquette University in Milwaukee before Wisconsin’s big presidential primary Feb. 19.

Clinton and her political friends obviously favor a debate for more than civic reasons. Yet Obama should wholeheartedly accept the invitation anyway.

The Illinois senator is going to need Wisconsin — both now and in November — if he wants to become president. Our swing state deserves its own debate with questions focusing on Wisconsin, the Midwest and the economy.

Obama already has a lot going for him here in the heartland. He’s won a string of contests in diverse states since his strong showing on Super Tuesday a week ago. Obama also will make his second appearance in Madison Tuesday evening with a giant rally at the Kohl Center.

Obama has been running television commercials in Wisconsin and enjoys the enthusiastic support of Gov. Jim Doyle. On top of that, Wisconsin’s open primary makes it easy for independents to participate. And independents are so far supporting Obama in higher numbers.

With all that going against her, Clinton could use an edge, something to shake up the Democratic race here and nationally.

While some debates are sleepy affairs that fail to cover new ground, others can dramatically shift a campaign. That’s why Clinton is making the proposed Wisconsin debate a big deal.

ABC, WISN-TV (Ch. 12), Marquette University Law School and wispolitics.com would sponsor the debate in Milwaukee. ABC’s George Stephanopoulos would moderate with a panel of Wisconsin journalists.

It’s worth noting that Stephanopoulos once worked for Bill Clinton’s White House. But that shouldn’t stop Obama from accepting the challenge. Stephanopoulos will be under tremendous pressure to be even-handed or else risk his own reputation as a broadcaster.

Obama’s spokesman in Wisconsin notes that Obama has already participated in 18 debates with Clinton and agreed to two more in the coming weeks. He certainly deserves credit and respect for that.

But Obama hasn’t agreed to the Wisconsin debate — even though a full week precedes our primary without any other contests in other states.

Obama shouldn’t dodge this big one. He should accept so that the people of Wisconsin can view him side by side with his Democratic opponent in meaningful and tailored debate — one that we won’t soon forget if Obama is the nominee this fall.

— Wisconsin State Journal
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

barbara levin wrote on Feb 17, 2008 12:29 PM:

" the wisconsin "debate" was not on the original debate calendar -
it was quickly sought by former Clinton WH aide George Stephanoupoulus in request to Sen Clinton needing/wanting a debate a week after her Super Tuesday showing --

Sen Obama had a calendar planning to campaign in Wisconsin - Sen Clinton thought it would be over after Feb 5th--
Sen Obama came to Wisconsin the night of the Potomac Primary - Sen Clinton went to Texas--

It seems to me the people of Wisconsin should have a greater concern that Sen Clinton is campaigning in Wiscoinsin for less than two days - than once again - trying to change things to the way she needs them to be
---
Sen Clinton refused all debates in her 2006 Senatorial run -- she only favors debates as a quick cheap way to make some quick cheap shots --
--
Pres Bill Clinton once famously said you should always work for the next election because if you don't win - there may not be another election after that --

Wisconsin - you are the next election --
This is one time Hillary should have taken Bill's advise "

Ni wrote on Feb 14, 2008 3:35 PM:

" Although in general debates are a good idea,
modern TV anchors do not often ask tough, substantive questions, so the debates are often just campaign talking points.
I noticed this in both the South Carolina and California debates.
"


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Coulee News.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The Coulee News, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The Coulee News requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Coulee News. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.