Newspaper Ads from the 7 Rivers Region Classifieds from the 7 Rivers Region Jobs in the 7 Rivers Region Cars in the 7 Rivers Region Homes for Sale in the 7 Rivers Region Rental PRoperties in the 7 Rivers Region & Rivers Region Website Directory Shopping in the 7 Rivers Region
 SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > Features > Story

Published - Wednesday, June 13, 2007

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (2 comment(s))

Tax incentives are proposed for alternative fuel vehicles

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
In the past few months, legislators have introduced a flurry of proposals designed to promote alternative-fuel vehicles, including proposals that would provide income-tax credits for consumers buying hybrid, flexible fuel and electric vehicles.

Currently eight other states provide some sort of tax incentives for hybrid electric vehicles: Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oregon, South Carolina and Washington.

In February, Rep. Michael Sheridan, R-Janesville, introduced AB85, which also provides for income and franchise tax credits equal to the amount of sales and use taxes a person pays on the purchase or lease of flexible-fuel vehicles for highway use capable of using both gasoline and E-85, a mixture of gasoline and at least 85 percent ethanol. The credit would be a maximum of $1,000 of the state sales tax and applied towards the first $20,000 of the purchase price.

The bill also provides for income and franchise tax credits for the purchase of E85 fuel. The amounts of fuel eligible for credit range from 100 gallons in 2007 to 500 gallons or more of E85 purchased in 2012.

Based on estimates of 117,703 of these type of FFVs registered in Wisconsin as of June 30, 2006, the state is estimating approximately 18,000 new FFVs will be sold in 2008 and would result in a loss of approximately $18 million revenue from income taxes in 2008.

In March, Rep. Joseph Parisi, D-Madison, introduced AB174 which would give income-tax credits for the amount of sales and use taxes paid for the purchase of hybrid motor vehicles that have a federal Environmental Protection Agency rating of no less than 40 miles per gallon or at least 15 percent greater mileage than the same models that are not hybrid motor vehicles.

This bill does not include leased vehicles for credit. The state has estimated it would lose $3.8 million in revenues from those income-tax credits in 2008.

A third bill (AB371) introduced May 29 by Rep. Sheryl Albers, R-Reedsburg, provides income- and franchise-tax credits for the purchase or lease of a motor vehicle that has a chemically fueled internal combustion engine capable of operating on gasoline, one or more alternative fuels or diesel fuel, or by means of a gas turbine, and is also equipped with an electric motor and energy storage device; a vehicle that qualifies as a neighborhood electric vehicle; a plug-in hybrid-electrical vehicle; an engine modification kit; and to businesses that purchase a sign advertising E85 fuel.

In an attempt to keep the revenue losses to the state down, this bill allows tax credits for purchase or lease only if the vehicle is manufactured in Wisconsin. So far, there has been no fiscal estimate for this bill, but it seems to be on the fast track as it is already before the Joint Finance Committee.

There is only one plant in Wisconsin that produces FFVs, in Janesville. There is a company in Reedsburg that produces neighborhood electric vehicles.

Consumers buying E85 vehicles face a dilemma with finding fuel. There are currently only 67 gas stations across the state providing E85 fuel and 1,200 across the country. There are two stations in the La Crosse area; Hansen’s IGA in West Salem and Kwik Trip at Oak Forest Road in Onalaska.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Assistant editor Matthew Perenchio wrote on Jun 15, 2007 10:12 AM:

" As noted in the previous comment, the Coulee News would like to make the following corrections: Rep. Michael Sheridan is a Democrat, not a Republican, and bill AB 371 has not gone before the Joint Finance Committee. For clarification purposes, it should be noted language in the story pertaining to AB 85 is "as originally proposed" and not "as amended." The Coulee News apologizes and regrets the errors. As far as other information posted in the comment, there appears to be items we are not privy to and would encourage the writer to contact reporter Jo Anne Killeen at (608) 786-6816 or joanne.killeen@lee.net so we can make additional corrections if need be. "

Interested Reader wrote on Jun 14, 2007 10:10 AM:

" This article contains some inaccuracies that should be pointed out to your readers. First, three proposals does not constitute a flurry and two of these bills are holdovers from last session. Second, Rep. Sheridan of Janesville is a Democrat not a Republican. His bill (AB 85) was introduced with Rep. Gene Hahn, a Republican from Cambria. Third, the bill was amended in committee and is now very different than its previous form. The Legislative Fiscal Bureau estimates that the fiscal impact of the bill as amended would be $12.7 million for fiscal year 2008-09 (memo to Rep. Hahn dated May 9th). AB 85 was recommended for passage as amended by the Assembly Committee on Biofuels and Sustainable Energy. Because of the bill’s price tag, it is now before the Joint Finance Committee. For more information on the current version of the bill, interested readers can read more at http://www.legis.state.wi.us/2007/data/lc_amdt/ab085.pdf. Fourth, Rep. Parisi’s bill, AB 174, was recommended for passage by the Assembly Committee on Ways and Means yesterday. The bill was amended by the committee but an analysis of the amendment was not yet available on the Legislature’s website. The bill has not yet been referred to another committee. Fifth, AB 371 was introduced with Rep. Barbara Gronemus, a Democrat from Whitehall. AB 371 is largely based on the amended version of AB 85, except that it includes hybrids and electric vehicles, it does not require the use of E85, it creates a credit for the installation of an engine modification kit, and only applies to vehicles built in Wisconsin. Since Rep. Sheridan also works as the President of UAW Local 95 in Janesville where (as the article said) the only flex fuel vehicles made in Wisconsin are made, his bill could not include a limitation that would restrict a credit to vehicles made in Wisconsin (the Ethics Board would likely consider it a conflict of interests for Sheridan if the Janesville GM plant was the only beneficiary). Sixth, the installation of an engine modification kit would void a car owner’s warranty. So, the $50 credit would not be used by informed consumers. Seventh, AB 371 is not before the Joint Finance Committee at this time. However, it is up for a hearing before the Assembly Committee on Biofuels and Sustainable Energy next week. Eighth, the article did not mention a provision in Governor Jim Doyle’s budget proposal that would have given gas station owners a 25% tax credit for the state permitting costs associated with the installation of a new E85 tank/pump. This provision was removed but the Joint Finance Committee. "


The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Coulee News.

 Post a comment »

(optional)
   
Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2006 The Coulee News. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.