SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer

TOP HOMES

HomeSeller
Top Homes



TOP WHEELS

WHEELS
FOR YOU




 Home > Opinion > Story

Published - Thursday, March 22, 2007

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (5 comment(s))

GUEST COLUMN: Reverse child support cuts

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
Child support payments are often the only rope holding a child above the poverty line. Now imagine that the successful federal program binding that rope is cut — so severely that one Wisconsin community must resort to holding a raffle to fill the hole left in their budget.

Hard to imagine? But that’s exactly what happened when the president signed a law that slashed federal funding for child support enforcement.

The child support enforcement program collects outstanding payments and funds other activities aimed at getting child support to the families who need it. The cut left thousands of Wisconsin’s children, relying on child support payments for basic necessities, dangling by a thread.

I fought against that legislation because I thought it would hurt Wisconsin families — now we are seeing its toll. A Feb. 15 article in the Ashland Daily Press detailed the negative impact the child support enforcement cuts will have on state and county budgets. The numbers are disturbing.

Nationally, more than $8 billion in child support owed by non-custodial parents will go uncollected over the next decade. That figure, from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, is misleading, because it assumes that every state will be able to step-in and make up for half of the funding cut.

If cash-strapped states are unable to fill the gap, it is estimated that nearly $17 billion will go uncollected and never reach the families that need it.

Wisconsin has been hit harder than most. Why? Amazingly, the answer lies in the success that our state has demonstrated in its child support program. While the national program collects $4.10 for every federal dollar spent — a success by any measure for a federal program — Wisconsin collects, on average, about $6. The federal government rewarded the efforts of Wisconsin’s child support agencies with incentive payments, allowing for even greater investments in our program. The cuts target these incentives — penalizing our state for its success.

I have heard directly from Wisconsin child support enforcement agencies on how these cuts will affect them. I was stunned that La Crosse County officials held a raffle to help support their child support agency.

I applaud their hard work and initiative in their effort to care for the children who need these child support payments. And I applaud Governor Doyle’s efforts to help fill the gap. But it is not enough.

I recently introduced bipartisan legislation to reverse these extremely harmful cuts and restore federal funding to child support enforcement. I hope to work with my colleagues in the Senate, on both sides of the aisle, and with the rest of Wisconsin’s congressional delegation to get this legislation passed.

Restoring these cuts is the right thing to do. It will help our state; it will help our counties. Most importantly, however, it will help hardworking, single-parent Wisconsin families.

I believe we can do better. I believe we can, and should, continue to reward a successful program. It is our responsibility in Congress to do what we can to help the families of Wisconsin, and I hope my colleagues will join me in supporting legislation that will do exactly that.
.
   Advertisement   
 Tell us what you think...

 Comments »

Ed Kempen wrote on Mar 28, 2007 10:26 AM:

" Kerb Kohl is wrong on this one. The only direct beneficiary of Child Support Enforcement (Title IV-D) are the state bureaucracies themselves. Using this program and passing the money across the system of agencies, lawyers, and the courts there is more incentive to pursue and harrass non-custodial parents than to protect the public from the unjust kidnappings by the court system that put them there in the first place. The same agencies that are coloring the facts for Sen. Kohl's office just want to keep their agency funding awash in cash. It is a bloated system designed to first deprive children of equal access to BOTH parents, then to pursue the losers of custody. Why not just let parents be parents? Kids grow and respond best when raised by two fit, loving, and involved parents - not single parents. If we don't legislate both parents first then this program just supports the tyrants of the courts. "

Lary Holland wrote on Mar 27, 2007 9:21 PM:

" The West Salem Coulee News published an opinion piece by U.S. Senator Herb Kohl, "GUEST COLUMN: Reverse child support cuts," which aims to convince the public to support legislation to reverse specific provisions of the Budget Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 that closed a loophole that states were taking advantage of in their child support enforcement programs. (Source: West Coulee News March 22, 2007) In July 2006, I took the time to write Secretary of Treasury Henry Paulson, regarding plans that were being put into place to reverse the progress made in 2005 to close funding loopholes in the voluntary Title IV-D program that the states were taking advantage of. In papers around the nation, government bureaucrats are busy starting the propaganda machine trying to convince the public that if funding cuts aren't reversed that children are going to be starving to death. These bureaucrats are leaving out some critical facts. What these bureaucrats are not telling you is that the majority of the cases being served by the affected programs are middle and upper income feuding families that have been placed into the program automatically to boost participation numbers and establish bigger reimbursement checks from the federal government. The purpose of over participation being encouraged by state and county officials is to conceal program failure and bring in money for state bureaucracies, not needy families or children. By focusing on the higher income collections using Income Withholding Orders state and county officials are able to drown out and dilute the overwhelming failure of their collections that are supposed to benefit actual needy families that are near or below the poverty line. The child support enforcement program focuses only on revenue generation for the state and county agencies, and the only numbers that should surprise Senator Herb Kohl is trying to explain how an agency that is reimbursed $66.00 of every $100.00 based on its expenditures can actually be on the verge of failing. To make it simple, an organization that only has to put up $1.00 and receives $2.00 back should have no excuse for having budget problems and should be seriously overhauled from the ground up to ensure that the families that need them are the ones that are serviced. It’s time to reign in free for all welfare spending programs to ensure that programs are not abused by states for revenue generation and that the families that are supposed to benefit from the program don't have to compete with the ones that don't belong at all. Just say no to Senator Herb Kohl trying to solve state overspending problems with programs that were meant for the needy not the rich. "

Lary Holland wrote on Mar 24, 2007 7:28 AM:

" The West Salem Coulee News published an opinion piece by U.S. Senator Herb Kohl, "GUEST COLUMN: Reverse child support cuts," which aims to convince the public to support legislation to reverse specific provisions of the Budget Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 that closed a loophole that states were taking advantage of in their child support enforcement programs. In July 2006, I took the time to write Secretary of Treasury Henry Paulson, regarding plans that were being put into place to reverse the progress made in 2005 to close funding loopholes in the voluntary Title IV-D program that the states were taking advantage of. In papers around the nation government bureaucrats are busy running the propaganda machine trying to convince the public that if funding cuts aren't reverse that children are going to be starving to death. What these bureaucrats are not telling you is that the majority of the cases being served by the affected programs are middle and upper income feuding families that have been placed into the program automatically to boost participation numbers. The purpose of over participation being encouraged by state and county officials is to conceal program failure and bring in money for state bureaucracies, not needy families or children. By focusing on the higher income collections using Income Withholding Orders state and county officials are able to drown out and dilute the overwhelming failure of their collections that are supposed to benefit actual needy families that are near or below the poverty line. The child support enforcement program focuses only on revenue generation for the state and counties, and the only numbers that should surprise Senator Herb Kohl is trying to explain how an agency that is reimbursed $66.00 of every $100.00 based on its expenditures can actually be on the verge of failing. To make it simple, an organization that only has to put up $1.00 and receives $2.00 back should have no excuse for having budget problems and should be seriously overhauled from the ground up to ensure that the families that need them are the ones that are serviced. It’s time to reign in these free for all welfare spending programs to protect the actual needy and the taxpayers. Just say no to Senator Herb Kohl trying to solve state budget problems with programs that were meant for the needy not the rich. "

To: Look at the other side.... wrote on Mar 23, 2007 9:33 AM:

" I have been a receiver and my husband, of 10 years, has been a payer, so I can honestly speak from both sides of the child support world. First, I would like to say that 17% for one child, is truly nothing compared to the cost of raising a child of any age. If you were to look at it this way, payer's wage is $10 per hour, 40hrs per week that would be $68 per week for 1 child!! Not enough. But then I look at my husband's net pay after child support for 2 children, 25%, after insurance and taxes, making $10 per hour, his net pay is about $400.00 every 2 weeks. He would never be able to support a safe home and the necessities without my income. I believe that a solution to this would be 50/50 custody, when both parties are fit of course. This eliminates child support completely. Unfortunately, in most custody type cases, to get the 50/50 it will cost at least $5000 with attorney and guardian ad litem fees. WI is a marital property state, which means one gets half of all "property" but when it comes to the children of divorce, the courts do not automatically award 50/50 custody, it has to become a courtroom battle first! VERY SAD! Maybe the legislation should think about this!! "

Look at the other side... wrote on Mar 22, 2007 11:29 PM:

" Sometimes, child support obligations are set so high that, after taxes, Fathers (typically the non-custodial parent) can not afford to even put a roof over his head, let alone have insurance or what is most important - a relationship with his child. If there was a sustinance level for Fathers, more would be able to pay, there would be fewer defaults, and less need for federal funding. As well, more Fathers would be able to have real relationships with their children - which is most important. The CS Guidelines themselves discriminate against lower wage non-custodial parents, and often lead to a new pverty. Its a flat rate system, that makes it manageable for higher income earners, and impossible for low wage workers. "


PLEASE NOTE: Comments on stories that frequently update through the day disappear with each update.
The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Coulee News.

Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments. Please identify the comment you're concerned about, the story to which the comment was attached, the date of the comment and the person who made the post.

 Post a comment (150 word limit) »

Log In - If you have already signed up with The Coulee News, please sign in now!
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 
Sign Up - To encourage intelligent and meaningful conversation, The Coulee News requires all commenters to register before posting comments. It's quick, it's easy, and it's free! Just fill in the information below to get started!

**Your Member ID and password will be required to log in. Your comments will appear under your user name.

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
Company:
Home Phone:
Business Phone:
*Address:
*City:
*State:
*Zip Code:
 

About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
Copyright © 2009 The Coulee News. All rights reserved.
Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.